Skip to content
Talento
Sign inGet started

Talento

Upload your CV, set your preferences, and find jobs that fit.

PrivacyTermsCookiesAccessibility

← All roles

Senior Quality Engineer

at Underscore

Boston, MA, USA, senior, full time, USD 1,40,000–1,80,000 / year, 8+ years

posted 29 Oct 2026

Apply for this roleSign in to track your application
  • Java
  • GitHub Actions
  • Playwright
  • JavaScript
  • Databricks
  • Zephyr Scale
  • RESTful APIs
  • AWS
  • Jira
  • Python
  • SQL

About the role

TetraScience

Quality Assurance

Boston, MA, USA

USD 140k-180k / year

Posted on Oct 29, 2026

What you would do

As a Senior Quality Engineer, you are the quality authority for your use cases. Your responsibilities will include:

• Own quality for your use cases and sign off their releases. Hold QE sign-off authority, including the decision to withhold it, against the criteria Compliance sets.

• Verify that what we built is what the customer asked for. Trace delivered work back to the documented requirements and make sure the evidence actually demonstrates them — not that a test merely ran.

• Make sure the SDLC is followed. Requirements, design review, test evidence and traceability are in place and in the right order, in a validated environment.

• Build and own test automation. Design robust, workflow-based automated tests across UI, API and database layers in our Playwright framework, and build them to be maintained and extended rather than rewritten.

• Keep improving how we test. Continuously raise the test and automation approach — coverage, cycle time, and where quality is known in the development cycle — rather than running the same suite faster.

• Use AI to do all of this better. Build automation with AI assistance, use it to generate and strengthen test cases and to improve the quality process itself, and apply judgement about where AI-generated work can and cannot stand as release evidence.

• Contribute to verifying the AI in your use cases. Help establish that evaluation thresholds were set before results were known, that test data was genuinely held out, and that the claims made match what was measured.

• Shape decisions before code is written. Raise testability, failure modes and risk in the squad while they are still cheap to change, using escape and defect patterns as your evidence.

• Own the hard testing. Performance, security, tenant isolation and resiliency, including failure and degradation behaviour, balanced against functional, integration and regression work. Test manually and exploratorily where that is the right tool — automation is a means to coverage and cycle time, not an end in itself, and the failures nobody wrote a requirement for are usually found by hand.

Read from jobs.underscore.vc, last seen 3d ago.

• Work directly with the customer's context. Collaborate with scientists, data engineers, solution architects, product managers and application developers across distributed teams, and ground what you test in how the customer actually uses the product.

• Self-manage. Estimate, prioritize and plan your own QE work, manage your delivery, resolve your own blockers, and escalate the right things at the right time.

What they are looking for

• 8+ years in quality engineering or SDET roles. Depth matters here, because the role depends on having seen enough systems fail to anticipate how this one will.

• Proven ownership of quality for a product area independently — you have been the person a team relied on, not one of several testers on a plan someone else wrote.

• Strong knowledge of software QA methodologies, tools and processes across the full SDLC, in an Agile/Scrum environment.

• Proven expertise designing comprehensive test plans and test cases for evolving requirements, and reporting test runs and defects meticulously.

• Proficiency in Python, Java or JavaScript, and deep hands-on experience with Playwright or equivalent for workflow-based end-to-end testing. You have built automation frameworks, not only written tests inside one.

• Advanced SQL and a strong understanding of database systems, for querying and verifying the integrity and correctness of scientific data; exposure to warehouse architectures such as Databricks is an advantage.

• Comfort integrating tests into CI/CD — pipeline stages and quality gates in GitHub Actions or equivalent.

• Strong, practical use of AI tooling for building automation, generating test cases and improving quality process, with good judgement about its output. Deep AI/ML specialization is not required; willingness to learn enough to verify the AI features in your use cases is.

• Experience with RESTful APIs, data pipelines, web applications and microservices on AWS, and with test management tooling such as Jira and Zephyr Scale.

• Experience producing and being accountable for release evidence in a validated environment, working to the standards Compliance defines. You do not need to be a regulatory expert — Compliance owns the interpretation, you own the evidence that satisfies it.

• Curiosity about the underlying science, and the ability to learn a scientific use case and the instruments behind it well enough to judge whether an output is correct. A science background or experience with scientific instruments is an advantage.

• BS/MS in Computer Science, Engineering, Data Science, a life science, or equivalent experience.

• Proactive and self-motivated, with the ability to thrive in a dynamic, fast-paced environment.

Join TetraScience and contribute to shaping the future of scientific research through innovative and high-quality software solutions!

* 100% employer-paid benefits for all eligible employees and immediate family members

* Unlimited paid time off (PTO) * 401K * Company paid Life Insurance, LTD/STD * A culture of continuous improvement where you can grow your career and get coaching

We are not currently providing visa sponsorship for this position

The salary range for this position is $140,000 - $180,000. The salary range posted reflects our target baseline for this role. Final compensation is determined by a thorough evaluation of factors including the candidate’s specific experience, localized market data, and internal team equity.